Been wondering about the value of having conversations with people whose politics can only be described as delusional. I't's really a waste of time. Just this week I found myself privy to social media discussions on a number of things from the current presidential race to education reform. In most cases the thread of the dialogues involved people trying to maintain civility while completely disagreeing with one another.
I've even come face to face with some folks who will always believe that Barak Obama is a Muslim. Paranoid delusion is the only explanation I can manage. I suppose this denial is something they really need to hold onto. Another "friend" of mine continues to bash teacher's unions in his desire to remove poor teachers and drive his view of "school reform." He conveniently forgets that these unions are composed of teachers and serve many purposes from securing a just wage to defending academic freedom.
I'm not going to take the bait anymore. I've been hooked and managed to throw the hook, so not going to go there any more. I'm coming to believe that it's only worthwhile to exchange views with people on education if they have taught more than a decade. Ridiculous, I know, but so many people have strong opinions on school reform and education policy who have just not walked the walk. So, I try not to talk their talk.
Another phenomena that keeps rearing it's ugly head is how to respond when someone makes a blatantly racist or homophobic or sexist statement in public. Of course, if you respond directly, you'll be labeled "politically correct." What happened to simply being correct? To merely tell the truth and to push back against those who do not. This would certainly be part of my curriculum. Great opportunity for role playing. Maybe one of these high paid TV executives could pitch a TV show that offers people a chance to role play these situations. "What Would You Do" comes close but what we need now is the opportunity to play the roles from all sides. Not gonna happen, is it?