Most teachers I know have heard the sound. They know when it is likely to happen,
and, truth be told, which student is likely to make it. Probably Social Science and Language
Arts teachers have more experience with it. Subjects that deal with the human condition are more likely
to produce the sound, but it’s definitely not exclusive to the humanities. All too often the sound is
predictable. In fact because a
teacher is often able to predict this occurrence it could actually be
avoidable. But censorship presents
other problems.
So what’s the mystery noise? It’s the enthusiastic, often adoring, sound of unbridled
excitement when one human being hits another.
You might be
showing a documentary on labor strife or the film version of a classic piece of
literature. When raw violence
occurs, usually in the form of a slap across the face, or as we’ve recently
seen in surveillance videos a knockout punch, there are always a few in any
classroom who literally jump out of their seats with joy. While others might wince, or look away,
or display empathy with the victim, these few who seem over the top with glee
get most of the attention. It
usually takes them a few minutes to calm down. Any information or film dialogue that follows the violent
outburst is always lost.
It’s unsettling.
It’s curiously disturbing.
It’s usually left alone.
We like to think that no person or culture values violence
for it’s own sake, but they do. In
my classroom experience it is most often the students whose childhood involves
corporeal punishment that react the most enthusiastically to violence. Their lives are most likely to be
filled with violence either from family, friends, or the amount they see in the
media. Physical fighting is often
encouraged. Discipline gets confused with punishment. Might usually makes right
in their world.
I taught a full year in a middle school once when the
historic education cutbacks hit California in the early 1980s. My students were mostly Latino and
African American. The school
principal was African American as was one of the three counselors. The year proved most enlightening for
many reasons. While my students
were engaged, intellectually curious, and developed a love of reading, there
were a few who acted out on occasion.
On one rare occasion that I sent a student to see his counselor because
it was not a good day for him to be in class, I was asked by the counselor if I
could please join a meeting between her and the student in question. She phoned to tell me that the boy’s
grandmother, with whom he lived, was not able to attend. After school that day I gladly went to
her office. I knew the back-story. The grandmother adopted Paul when his
parents abandoned him. In her late
seventies, she could barely get around so attending this
discipline meeting was out of the question. Mrs. Washington, the counselor, played a vital role in Paul’s
life. She was the role model he
needed. She set the limits and she
enforced the rules. Paul was not a
difficult student. He was not meaning,
vindictive or even unmotivated in the classroom. He simply found himself out of control on occasion and had
the habit of displacing his anger on his classmates or even his teachers. Mrs. Washington gave him a choice. He could either be suspended for two
days or face her consequences. We
all knew suspension would not be the choice. It was merely a formality because Mrs. Washington knew that
if he stayed home with grandma nothing productive would result. Paul chose the alternative. Mrs. Washington told him to get
ready. He then thrust forward his
arms and she produced a ruler from her desk drawer. I watched her strike his wrists with the ruler about 5 times
on each arm. Paul apologized for
his behavior in class and then left the office promising to be on time to class
the next day.
I never spoke much with Mrs. Washington about her method of
discipline. I knew that culturally
it was the norm. The rod was not
spared in many God-fearing families.
But this is part of the behavior that needs to change. Today that form of traditional
discipline is gone. Even the
wooden paddle “swats” my P.E. teachers administered to their all male classes
are a thing of the past. But
residual behaviors and attitudes survive. They have come to light as the technology continues to encroach on our time and privacy. Reluctantly or benevolently, we move forward.
2 comments:
I know of private schools that still do use corporal punishment, with parent permission. I could never agree to that. How can you explain to children that it is okay for adults to decide that children deserve to be hit, but then expect those same children not to hit others. "If you make me mad, I can hit you. But if someone else makes you mad, you cannot hit them. If you DO hit them, I will be mad, and I will hit you." ?????
Angel,
You are quite right, the contradiction is overwhelming. I've been watching and listening to the recent discussion that involves NFL players and finally I'm beginning to hear some observers discuss the irony of increasing violence in sports and the impact it seems to be having in the behavior of many athletes. Last night an African American commentator for ESPN said "I was raised with corporeal punishment too, but it's not right and it's time to change." (or something to that effect) This is the dialogue that hopefully will happen now. Thanks for reading,
B.G.
Post a Comment